Re: router firwalls?
From: CZ (CZ_at_no99spam.com)
Date: 04/08/04
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5 - Opinions ?"
- Previous message: David: "Re: Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5 - Opinions ?"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: router firwalls?"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: router firwalls?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 04:38:17 GMT
>> Nope. A router only does NAT (network address translation). Some people
classify NAT as a firewall, but it's not in my opinion. It's simply how a
router routes packets from external IP's (internet) to internal IP's (LAN).
Neo:
Router and NAT are two different concepts.
Router: does routing between two subnets via DA (destination address) and a
route table (OSI layer 3 only).
NAT as we use it: does one-to-many address translation via matching to a
port table (OSI layers 3 & 4).
And a stateless firewall: does packet filtering via packet header values
(OSI layers 3 & 4).
The problem is liberal usage of the word "router".
My Netgear RT314 "router" provides the functionality of all of the
following:
Router
NAT
Inbound and outbound stateless firewall rules on both interfaces
Note that I have used the RT314 with NAT disabled and it works as a basic
router, it allows communication between two subnets.
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5 - Opinions ?"
- Previous message: David: "Re: Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5 - Opinions ?"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: router firwalls?"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: router firwalls?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|