Re: Site VPN failed between Checkpoint AI R55 gateways
From: Shekar (csekar21_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 04/08/04
- Next message: David: "Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5 - Opinions ?"
- Previous message: gumpy: "kerio blocking problems"
- In reply to: Richard H Miller: "Re: Site VPN failed between Checkpoint AI R55 gateways"
- Next in thread: Shekar: "Re: Site VPN failed between Checkpoint AI R55 gateways"
- Reply: Shekar: "Re: Site VPN failed between Checkpoint AI R55 gateways"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 7 Apr 2004 18:32:09 -0700
rick@bcm.tmc.edu (Richard H Miller) wrote in message news:<c4s3kn$79m@gazette.corp.bcm.tmc.edu>...
> Shekar (csekar21@yahoo.com) wrote:
> : No problem with SIC, In fact i can push the policies without any problem.
>
>
>
>
> : "Beoweolf" <Beoweolf@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:<TPVbc.45983$rB4.3033@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>...
> : > SIC? has it been established between the FW and Nokia?
> : >
> : >
> : > "Shekar" <csekar21@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> : > news:5e014759.0404040414.4795cfa@posting.google.com...
> : > > Hi All,
> : > >
> : > > We are configuring new firewall in our local and remote office.
> : > > Check point AI R55 with HFA-02
> : > > Nokia IPSO 3.7.1
> : > > Windows 2000 SP4
> : > >
> : > > Local vpn-1 pro enforcement module - Nokia IP 350
> : > > Local checkpoint express smart center server - Windows 2000
> : > > (Statically NATed and enabled control connection located in LAN)
> : > >
> : > > Remote vpn-1 pro enforcement module - Nokia IP 130
> : > >
> : > > We can push the policies no problem. But we are not getting log from
> : > > remote module.
> : > > Site vpn also failed even the time sync is correct.
> : > > We have the following error in local log file - IKE: phase 1 received
> : > > notification from peer, invalid certificate.
> : > > Remote firewall module log shows the following error message.
> : > > IKE : Main mode validation timed out.
>
>
>
> Ok
>
> 1) Did you define a rule in both modules policy to allow IKE. This will be before any encryption rules
> and allows the two module to exchange key information
>
> 2) Did you export your CA information and install a certificate on the remote box and setup the appropriate
> trust for the cert's [From the error message it looks like you have the vpn define as a cert]. Is there a
> reson to use this instead of shared secret?
>
> 3) Have you setup a rule to allow the enforcement module to completly talk with the management server
>
> Richard H. Miller, MCSE, CCSE+
> Information Security Manager
> Information Technology Security and Compliance
> Information Technology - Baylor College of Medicine
1. VPN comuunity rule allows from any and all service. Installed both
firewalls
2. I do not have export option since both firewalls are internally
managed
3. My first rule allows any service from remote firewall to management
server
My setup is like this,
Local Firewall
Nokia IP 350 - Enforcement Module (IPSO 3.7.1) (CP AI - R55 with
HFA-2)
Int interface - 10.65.16.1
DMZ interface - 10.65.8.98
Ext interface - 209.20.128.60.198
Local Managment server
Windows 2000 sp4 - Smart center (CP AI - R55 with HFA-2)
IP address - 10.65.16.19 (Enabled static nat with ip address -
209.20.128.199) (Also enabled the control connection)
Remote firewall
Nokia IP 130 - Enforcement Module (IPSO 3.7.1) (CP AI - R55 with
HFA-2)
Int interface - 10.86.16.1
DMZ interface - 10.86.6.2
Ext interface - 211.158.158.220
First rule allows remote firewall to access management server (Service
- ANY)
also VPN community rule for site to site vpn (service - ANY)
Remote gateway & local gateway is the member of community.
Mangement server is also a Certificate authority. (Default)
I can do SIC and push policies to remote firewall. But when I try to
ping remote internal ip address, It is trying to establish the tunnel.
But error msg shows ( IKE phase 1 - recieved notification from
peer.invalid certificate) Even i am not receiving log from remote
firewall.
Both firewalls hosts file has the name and public IP address of
firewall and management server. So no problem with name resolution.
Date & time is correct in firewalls and management server.
- Next message: David: "Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5 - Opinions ?"
- Previous message: gumpy: "kerio blocking problems"
- In reply to: Richard H Miller: "Re: Site VPN failed between Checkpoint AI R55 gateways"
- Next in thread: Shekar: "Re: Site VPN failed between Checkpoint AI R55 gateways"
- Reply: Shekar: "Re: Site VPN failed between Checkpoint AI R55 gateways"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|