Re: Firewall with low overhead?
From: Duane Arnold (notme_at_notme.com)
Date: 03/15/04
- Next message: Big Will: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Previous message: Pietu: "Two SPI firewalls layered"
- In reply to: Russell: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Next in thread: Big Will: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:05:40 GMT
Russell <rwkeating-remove@comcast.net> wrote in
news:8tidnR3Ewte_bcndRVn-gg@comcast.com:
> This is a home system and I do have a NAT router. I do want the
> protection of a software firewall so I can keep tabs on what is trying
> to go out from my PC. It's not that Kerio is bring my system to its
> knees, I just like efficiency :).
>
Doesn't the router have logging and a utility to review the logs? You
should be doing that as well instead of depending upon some host based FW
for this that can be beaten.
Duane :)
- Next message: Big Will: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Previous message: Pietu: "Two SPI firewalls layered"
- In reply to: Russell: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Next in thread: Big Will: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
