Re: Firewall with low overhead?
From: Kerodo (kerodo~nospam~kenny_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/14/04
- Next message: Kerodo: "Re: Kerio 2.1.5 fireall loses settings"
- Previous message: Kerodo: "Re: Kerio 2.1.5 fireall loses settings"
- In reply to: Russell: "Firewall with low overhead?"
- Next in thread: jch: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:14:15 -0800
Russell wrote:
> I am running Windows XP Pro and Kerio 4.0.13. What are some
> recommendations for a firewall with less overhead (processing and memory
> use)?
>
> I originally started years ago with Tiny Firewall as it seamed to fit
> the bill. When Tiny changed to Kerio I went to Kerio 2.XX. When Kerio
> 4 came along I changed to that mostly because I was reading about
> concerns of compatibility with XP and Kerio 2 (although I didn't see any
> problems.)
>
> It seams like Firewalls (along with so many other programs now a days)
> start expanding their rolls and bloating out as time goes on.
>
> Thanks,
> Russell
I would just go back to Kerio 2.1.5 if I were you..
- Next message: Kerodo: "Re: Kerio 2.1.5 fireall loses settings"
- Previous message: Kerodo: "Re: Kerio 2.1.5 fireall loses settings"
- In reply to: Russell: "Firewall with low overhead?"
- Next in thread: jch: "Re: Firewall with low overhead?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
