Re: Watchguard -> bovpn
From: Scoundrel (svein-erik_at_it-24.no)
Date: 03/09/04
- Next message: Mike: "Re: WatchGuard WebBlocker perfromance question"
- Previous message: gmv: "Re: I need a decent firewall"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Watchguard -> bovpn"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Watchguard -> bovpn"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:04:33 +0100
No i havent, cause we`re remote watching over the servers at the brance
office using whatsup gold inside the tunnel, and the 80.x.x.x nets is
customer servers the brance office hosts. that we need to monitor and gain
access to if a service goes down.
therfor i got this big struggle to get this up and running..
is there a solution to this problem at all?
"Leythos" <void@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ab77d9db6483f2298a2fa@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <404d9126$1@news.broadpark.no>, svein-erik@it-24.no says...
> > I'm not able to supernet the networks cause they are public ip addresses
in
> > the 80.x.x.x/28 & 80.x.x.x/30 and one private supernettet address of the
> > 10.x.x.x/22 network.
> >
> > any clues how to solve this problem, so the brance office could see our
> > networks at the HQ ?
> >
> > (i only get dark green boxes on the watchguard status consol, on the
tunnel
> > insted of light green boxes )
> >
> > i would be very happy for any suggestions...
>
> Yuck, that's a nasty one. Why the heck are you using public IP's inside
> the lans at those two locations?
>
> Do you not have private IP addresses at all locations behind their
> routers/firewalls?
>
> --
> --
> spamfree999@rrohio.com
> (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Mike: "Re: WatchGuard WebBlocker perfromance question"
- Previous message: gmv: "Re: I need a decent firewall"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Watchguard -> bovpn"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Watchguard -> bovpn"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]