Re: Blocking Ports 137 to 139
From: \ (dvader_at_deathstar.mil)
Date: 01/21/04
- Next message: RaYzor: "Help please .. Port forwarding on a Lucent Superpipe?"
- Previous message: Brian: "Re: NAT Expertise Needed (Cisco,Watchguard,other)"
- In reply to: Nigel Wade: "Re: Blocking Ports 137 to 139"
- Next in thread: Nigel Wade: "Re: Blocking Ports 137 to 139"
- Reply: Nigel Wade: "Re: Blocking Ports 137 to 139"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:32:55 -0500
>Open up port 53 to all high ports. Sorry, I should have been clearer.
I believe you do because a firewall is not normally subject to or controlled by
the outgoing requests and will not selectively enable the return port for the
response. I don't know about the router. I've never used one. I never heard of
the "conntrack module." Is that part of the router?
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com?subject=Techtalk (Do not alter!) http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: RaYzor: "Help please .. Port forwarding on a Lucent Superpipe?"
- Previous message: Brian: "Re: NAT Expertise Needed (Cisco,Watchguard,other)"
- In reply to: Nigel Wade: "Re: Blocking Ports 137 to 139"
- Next in thread: Nigel Wade: "Re: Blocking Ports 137 to 139"
- Reply: Nigel Wade: "Re: Blocking Ports 137 to 139"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|