Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus
From: Alan P (alan_at_(nojunkplease)alancode.net)
Date: 01/15/04
- Next message: Alan P: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Previous message: Alexals: "Meaning of this firewall's message."
- In reply to: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Next in thread: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Reply: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Reply: Mimic: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:05:55 +0000 (UTC)
Do I read right?
11,000 pages?
That must be a *big* book :-|
"Hairy One Kenobi" <abuse@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
news:vwsMb.1448$JL4.10211@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
> "Tracker" <"snailmail(valid)222000"@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:40022E2E.669E1C2D@yahoo.com...
> > Hairy One Kenobi wrote:
> >
> > > "Mimic" <null@void.net> wrote in message
> > > news:_dednayw3N9dJJzdRVn-jw@brightview.com...
> > > > "Hairy One Kenobi" <abuse@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > news:IygMb.1087$JL4.7792@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
> > > > > "Duane Arnold" <notme@notme.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:Xns946D5049EAE94darnold92insightbbco@204.127.204.17...
> > > > > > Tracker <"snailmail(valid)222000"@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > > > > > news:40010C59.FE6C9173@yahoo.com:
> > >
> > > > Unfortuanetly thats already been done. She posted (3?) chapters, had
> > > > indepenant verdicts. Then
> > > > just made comments against each one saying that they have had the
> > > experience
> > > > of innocent
> > > > victims computers. It all went through usenet, I can find it if you
> want,
> > > > i'm just too lazy to right now
> > > > It was through alt.2600 iirc
> > >
> > > Didn't see that one, I'm afraid (and don't hang out in a.2) A
> > > post/Deja/Google reference would be appreciated (fair game - already
> "done"
> > > what I can see, happy for Tracker to try and justify..)
> > >
> > > Would prefer a true independent (new or not to posting here, I don't
> think
> > > I've been backward in coming forward ;o) to provide the review. That
> said,
> > > would still be very happy to provide my best shot..
> > >
> > > Tracker.. I'm waiting.. and no problem with NDAs.
>
> > There have been a number of people who did Review a few Chapters of my
> book
> > and my responses were posted here on Usenet.
>
> I realise that.. I was one of them, if you recall. 27th December, if you
> needed a reminder.
>
> Can I assume, then, that you are unwilling to submit the entire virtual
> tome, and that you stand by that appalling mass of inaccuracies on your
web
> site?
>
> H1K
>
>
- Next message: Alan P: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Previous message: Alexals: "Meaning of this firewall's message."
- In reply to: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Next in thread: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Reply: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Reply: Mimic: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
