Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus
From: David W. Hodgins (dhodgin1661_at_nomail.afraid.org)
Date: 01/11/04
- Next message: Donald Newcomb: "Configuration of Symantec Client Firewall in home network?"
- Previous message: Mangled&Munged: "Re: Buying a router for dummies"
- In reply to: ± Žete ±: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Next in thread: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Reply: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:12:09 GMT
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:12:34 +0000, ± Žete ± <user@hostname.domain> wrote:
> With 33 replies to her original poast (at the time of writing here, just in
> alt.computer.security), she's getting the attention she wants. Yes, I am
> guilty too. Until we *all* stop replying, me included, the poasts will
> continue I'm sure.
See http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=Bz6ia.10768%24%25U1.3593393%40news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
for an explanation of why it isn't a good idea for everyone to just ignore her.
I agree, that we don't need so many replies, pointing out how bad her advice is,
but she can't be ignored completely, by the regulars, or the poor newbies will
damage their systems, by following her "advice".
Regards, Dave Hodgins
-- Change nomail.afraid.org to rogers.com to reply by email. (nomail.afraid.org has been set up specfically for use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
- Next message: Donald Newcomb: "Configuration of Symantec Client Firewall in home network?"
- Previous message: Mangled&Munged: "Re: Buying a router for dummies"
- In reply to: ± Žete ±: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Next in thread: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Reply: valid: "Re: Trojan Horse is More Damaging then a Virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
