Re: hardware firewall
From: \ (dvader_at_deathstar.mil)
Date: 01/06/04
- Next message: Seth: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Previous message: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: hardware firewall"
- Next in thread: Stephen: "Re: hardware firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:37:35 -0500
>I would suggest that he purchase the full server version for testing -
>can be purchased cheap (free if you don't mind the 120 day demo) and
>design on that platform.
>As for securing it - a router with NAT and then IP security (for server
>version) will cover what he needs... As long as he takes the proper
>steps to SECURE the OS as outlined in MS articles.
The lite version is sufficient for my purposes. It is never open to the public,
only to a few select (and trusted) people for short periods. My firewall
(AtGuard) is sufficient to restrict access to only those users and only when the
proper rules are enabled. I am comfortable with my security. Your mention of the
Allow/Block feature in IIS just caught my attention.
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com?subject=Techtalk (Do not alter!) http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: Seth: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- Previous message: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: sick of Linux bias"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: hardware firewall"
- Next in thread: Stephen: "Re: hardware firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]