Why is IPTABLES so complicated
From: Mike Harrison (mharrison_at_aol.com)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: Raffi: "Re: Annoying ZoneAlarm Tray Icon"
- Previous message: Raffi: "Re: Annoying ZoneAlarm Tray Icon"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply: NeoSadist: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply: The Saint: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply: W.B: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:26:06 -0500
compare to creating an access-list on a pix to permit an inbound port, all
you do is enter one line of course the pix by default permits all outbound
traffic.
but on IPTABLES its requires lots of things. why not make IPTABLES configs
similar to a pix style.
- Next message: Raffi: "Re: Annoying ZoneAlarm Tray Icon"
- Previous message: Raffi: "Re: Annoying ZoneAlarm Tray Icon"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply: NeoSadist: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply: The Saint: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Reply: W.B: "Re: Why is IPTABLES so complicated"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|