Re: stats needed - % bandwith utilization by port. FW-1 4.1 w/cisco
From: Dave Thornburgh (dave-thorn_at_nodash.verizon.net.invalid)
Date: 12/03/03
- Previous message: Hanna Lahy: "Re: Catch 22 with Norton Internet Security"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: stats needed - % bandwith utilization by port. FW-1 4.1 w/cisco"
- Next in thread: 1: "Re: stats needed - % bandwith utilization by port. FW-1 4.1 w/cisco"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 04:43:01 GMT
"NeoSadist" <neosad1st@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vsqk9pgog00qd4@corp.supernews.com...
> 1 wrote:
>
> > X% total bandwith used for the T-1 on a specific day was incoming
traffic
> > on port 25 to IP
> > x.x.x.x
>
> This is ftp, and why do your users require it? They could probably do
> without ftp unless they can prove otherwise.
> > X number bps for the week was outgoing traffic on port 21 to all IP
> > addresses total
>
> You should be very careful of port 21 traffic. First off, all internal
IP's
> should send that traffic to your email server (whether you run your own or
> allow the use of pop email accounts). I'd limit it to the known
> IP's/addresses of the smtp and pop email accounts.
Neo! More Coffee, STAT!
- Previous message: Hanna Lahy: "Re: Catch 22 with Norton Internet Security"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: stats needed - % bandwith utilization by port. FW-1 4.1 w/cisco"
- Next in thread: 1: "Re: stats needed - % bandwith utilization by port. FW-1 4.1 w/cisco"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
