Is WatchGuard Firebox III stable?
From: Mike (mike_aig_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/03/03
- Next message: Hanna Lahy: "Re: Catch 22 with Norton Internet Security"
- Previous message: NeoSadist: "Re: stats needed - % bandwith utilization by port. FW-1 4.1 w/cisco"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Is WatchGuard Firebox III stable?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Is WatchGuard Firebox III stable?"
- Reply: john_at_noemail.invalid: "Re: Is WatchGuard Firebox III stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 2 Dec 2003 18:58:49 -0800
Hi,
Currently we use WatchGuard Firebox II to protect our company's small
network.
Since WatchGuard is not going to support this firewall model anymore,
we are thinking of upgrading it to Firebox III (Firebox 700).
Is the Firebox III more stable than Firebox II? Is there any
significant
performance and feature improvement over the previous model?
I asked this question because my old Firebox II often locks up and
must be cold-rebooted once every two months.
Thanks in advance!
-Mike
- Next message: Hanna Lahy: "Re: Catch 22 with Norton Internet Security"
- Previous message: NeoSadist: "Re: stats needed - % bandwith utilization by port. FW-1 4.1 w/cisco"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Is WatchGuard Firebox III stable?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Is WatchGuard Firebox III stable?"
- Reply: john_at_noemail.invalid: "Re: Is WatchGuard Firebox III stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|