Re: IPSec and Passive FTP
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:04:17 -0500
>IPSEC? Oh, my bad, for a moment I thought you were talking about a firewall
:)
>IPSEC sucks, in my opinion: get a better firewall.
I have a better firewall. My adventures with IPSec are a Learning Experience.
--
Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction
crash@gpick.com
http://lists.gpick.com
Relevant Pages
- Re: Win2K Security & Firewall - long post
... IPSec, and more so some reasons why it might be a bad idea for MS to ... realize that tailoring an IPSec policy for a specific home user, ... disabled their personal firewall. ... Won't work if the malware uses a "legitimate" means of disabling ...
(comp.security.firewalls) - Re: Isolate systems
... some sort of port/protocol/Ip/mac"filtering" via switches, ipsec filtering, ... firewall yourself from outside the network, even if you use a self scan site ... If legitimate users are trying to attack your computers you may have to see ...
(microsoft.public.win2000.security) - Re: sysvol replication breaks when IPSec running between DCs & fir
... IPSec" as per as per Steve Riley ... I do not know how to write a firewall rule to ensure that IP ... Riley says you can "Encapsulate domain controller traffic inside ... the IPsec exists underneath the Windows Firewall ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory) - Re: Win2K Security & Firewall - long post
... coupled with the fact that most Win2K users are not home users. ... > the regard of disabling insecure functionality within specific ... > of whether or not IPSec is a good thing or not it is just one of those ... > disabled their personal firewall. ...
(comp.security.firewalls) - Re: VPN not working when client behind another firewall
... The latest is that we have tested the ports and GRE ... >place a hardwarebased firewall router out in front of SBS ... This area is NAT-T over IPSec across ... >server to work when behind a NAT. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) |
|
