Re: Kerio echo
From: Dirk Claessens (will.bounce_at_invalid)
Date: 11/07/03
- Next message: optikl: "Re: black ice usage question"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: black ice usage question"
- In reply to: EnigmaX: "Re: Kerio echo"
- Next in thread: BoB: "Re: Kerio echo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 13:26:38 GMT
on 07 nov 2003, "EnigmaX" wrote in comp.security.firewalls :
> No you don't, and RFC doesn't matter when you run a stealth firewall.
> RFC doesn't mean jack anymore when it comes to stealth configurations.
>
Never forget that without the RFC's, we would be sending letters to each
other, instead of communicating here. What's the big security problem with
allowing a system to respond to a ping? They know your system is up, so
what, as long as you run a good firewall?
All a firewall can do, is discard the pings, but it can't **stop** them
from pinging you, or sending you a "ping of death"; someway or another, a
firewall will have to "consume" whatever is being send to it.
-- Dirk. Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused. http://users.pandora.be/dirk.claessens2
- Next message: optikl: "Re: black ice usage question"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: black ice usage question"
- In reply to: EnigmaX: "Re: Kerio echo"
- Next in thread: BoB: "Re: Kerio echo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]