Re: IPSEC
From: -S (email_at_email.com)
Date: 10/18/03
- Next message: Bob Walker: "Point-to-Point VPN with Netscreen 5XP"
- Previous message: David: "Re: Tracking Who Is Leeching Off My Network!"
- In reply to: -S: "Re: IPSEC"
- Next in thread: ClareOldie: "Re: IPSEC"
- Reply: ClareOldie: "Re: IPSEC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:20:21 GMT
this is EXACTLY what i was looking for.... THANKS A MILLION!!
;o)
http://www.analogx.com/contents/articles/ipsec.htm
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:30:49 GMT, -S <email@email.com> wrote:
>i really do appreciate your insight and the link you have provided. i
>am looking at this site now.
>thank you for taking the time to reply to this post.
>:o)
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:20:31 +0100, "ClareOldie"
><ClareOldie@nowhere.ie> wrote:
>
>>
>>"ClareOldie" <ClareOldie@nowhere.ie> wrote in message
>>news:95Yjb.1539$bD.5476@news.indigo.ie...
>>> Forgot this
>>> http://www.analogx.com/contents/articles/ipsec.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> Seán
>>>
>>>
>>Seems I was wrong earlier - sorry
>>
>>Quote:
>>How IPSec rules works
>>
>> Rules in IPSec are handled in very simple approach, the closest match to
>>the incoming packet determines how it is handled overriding everything above
>>it. So if you have two rules, one that denies all TCP traffic and another
>>that permits HTTP traffic (port 80 TCP), then your server is effectively
>>blocking everything that doesn't connect on port 80. Running a FTP server on
>>the same machine? Not anymore... If you want it accessible, then you need to
>>add another rule permitting FTP traffic (port 20/21 TCP).
>>
>>Seán
>>
- Next message: Bob Walker: "Point-to-Point VPN with Netscreen 5XP"
- Previous message: David: "Re: Tracking Who Is Leeching Off My Network!"
- In reply to: -S: "Re: IPSEC"
- Next in thread: ClareOldie: "Re: IPSEC"
- Reply: ClareOldie: "Re: IPSEC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
