Re: any significant differenes in these three?
From: W.B. (civikminded_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/07/03
- Next message: Mike: "Re: Something (Trojan?) Takes Over Mouse"
- Previous message: W.B.: "Re: VCN thru SonicWall VPN....or perhaps not !"
- In reply to: dean: "any significant differenes in these three?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:20:26 -0500
On 6 Oct 2003 16:33:33 -0700, dean wrote:
> For 3 branch offices with under 50 users each; no public access
> servers:
> Should we use Netscreen 50,Sonicwall Pro 100, or Symantec 200r.
> They need to VPN into a CP Firewall/VPN-1 (and checkpoint gets no more
> money from us) at the headquarter office.
>
> Thanks for any observations , recommendations, tips .
I like Netscreens. So much more flexible than the Sonicwall devices, and
less VPN 'wierdness'.. Also, a Netscreen 25 would be plenty for 50 users.
-W
- Next message: Mike: "Re: Something (Trojan?) Takes Over Mouse"
- Previous message: W.B.: "Re: VCN thru SonicWall VPN....or perhaps not !"
- In reply to: dean: "any significant differenes in these three?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
