Re: Trackers Second Review Response
From: Murray Cooper (chuck_at_up.chuck)
Date: 10/04/03
- Previous message: Omar©: "Re: Trackers Second Review Response"
- In reply to: FromTheRafters: "Re: Trackers Second Review Response"
- Next in thread: Murray Cooper: "Re: Trackers Second Review Response"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 22:22:45 GMT
FromTheRafters wrote:
> "Mike" <nospam@notherematey.com> wrote in message news:blho1k$fl5$1@thorium.cix.co.uk...
>
>
>>IMHO Language as it is written and spoken is constantly changing and
>>evolving. As long as you get your meaning across, who cares!
>>
>>OK so "to boldly go" may be grammatically incorrect, but everyone knows what
>>is meant and as long as the meaning has come across, languange has performed
>>its function.
>
>
> True, but if someone misunderstands you, it is nice to be able to
> show that what was inferred was not what was implied, and have
> a basis on which to prove it. If gramattical rules are set aside, the
> language can get awfully "wishy-washy".
>
> "I saw many people driving my car to work from home".
"Throw Momma from the train a kiss."
>
> The above statement can easily be misunderstood in a variety
> of ways even though the person saying it may believe, as you
> do, that the the point came across. The egocentric "I know
> what I meant" is not sufficient to make that statement valid.
>
>
- Previous message: Omar©: "Re: Trackers Second Review Response"
- In reply to: FromTheRafters: "Re: Trackers Second Review Response"
- Next in thread: Murray Cooper: "Re: Trackers Second Review Response"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|