Re: Limiting access to US users only

From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 09/17/03


Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 19:11:45 GMT

In article <9gahmv462rg55ja4ssp8j2237c3sb3jjpp@4ax.com>,
jUNDERSCOREhodson@ntlworld.com.invalid says...
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 18:05:55 GMT, T.R.
> <Spammers_R_Godless_Pedophiles@inbred.com> wrote:
>
> [SNIP all of TR's kindly worms ... whoops, words]
>
> TR, you appear to know the mate of mine who's due to pop around to my
> home in a few moments!
>
> A mate of the above mentioned mate thought she was fully protected
> because she'd bought NAV2002. Updating the AV sigs? Not a chance. When
> I peeked at her system I found she was about 18 months out of date.
> She had not updated the AV sigs since she purchased NAV.
>
> Perhaps even worse, my mate, who've I've tried to educate about the
> ins and outs of ZoneAlarm (hardly complex), still misses the point. As
> far as I can tell, the only program he has installed that's grossly
> different from anything on my PC is Kazzar (spelling?). Whatever I
> say, he still maintains in letting all his programs having server
> rights. (Allow all on ZA.) Svchost.exe, although I'm not exactly sure
> what it does, is the one that scares me. Now, TR, I'm not sure, as
> I've said, about the ins and and outs of security, but I'm pretty
> certain that allowing server rights to most progs is not a good idea.
> I operate on the opposite principle: I disallow everything.
>
> On the topic of "functional imbeciles", I suppose I must be doing
> something right as I have yet to be infected with any sort of "nasty"
> ever since I've been online (some 15 years, including BBs) and all of
> the Symantec removal tools report me as being "clean". During that
> time I've use a variety of firewall / AV software progs.
>
> TR says: "No my fine feathered friend..."
> I do hope, TR, you're not referring to my receding hairline! ;-/

Hey, if you want to try something, try running SpyBot Search and
Destroy. I've been on-line more than 20 years (BBS at 110Baud back then)
and never been infected either. I have hundreds of workstations and
servers under my control based on my security designs and none of them
have ever been infected either.

It's interesting to see what SpyBot comes up with when you run it on
people machines that are not under your control, even more amazing for
people that are disbelievers in security :)
 

-- 
--
spamfree999@rrohio.com
(Remove 999 to reply to me)


Relevant Pages

  • Re: SetTime2.vbs file not working anymore
    ... some poor programming in it but it seems logically correct). ... errors, probably from the server, on the alternative time server. ... > oh well, can't say we didn't give it the ol' college try, eh mate! ... > hey, iz there really a yellow brick road, leading to OZ ?! ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Paging AndrewR
    ... Wicked Uncle Nigel wrote: ... > Sorry mate, a brain fart managed to delete your email from my server ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Paging AndrewR
    ... Sorry mate, a brain fart managed to delete your email from my server ... Can you resend it please? ... Wicked Uncle Nigel - There are few things in life more sinister than a ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Problem starting win2k pro.
    ... >> I wonder if you could help me out here as I am stuck. ... >> Win 2k server starts normally but when I tried to start ... >- What's the recent history of the machine? ... Thanks mate! ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.general)
  • Re: IIS Seperate Partition?
    ... > Or, had you installed the security patch, available six months prior ... > under Server 2003, the OS the original poster said he's running. ... Which makes moving the folder to a separate partition a shot ... And anyone who is able to control a partition already ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)

Quantcast