Re: Kerio PF vs Sygate PF

From: Alastair Smeaton (smeaton_at_dsl.pipex.com)
Date: 09/16/03


Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:34:46 +0100

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:09:08 +0200, "nebula"
<donotemailme@nowhere.com> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I just installed Kerop PF version 2.1.5 on a fully patched win2k pro box (UK
>edition). I also run F-Secure AV 5.40 as my antivirus tool. I do not know
>why, but when I have Kerio PF installed my Internet access is "sloooooooow"
>(to be mild). When i disable the firewall, then performance is just as slow
>as with the fw enabled.
>
>I also installed Sygate PF (5.1 build 1615s) and with this tool I have no
>problems whatsoever. Did anyone else had this problem? Not that I mind
>running SPF, but I wanted to run KPF, but when it keeps this sluggish, then
>I will not install it again.
>
>Nebula
>

Have used both and never has a p[roblem with Kerio slowing down.

try a google search for "sponge" and kerio and you will find a ruleset
you can import

That would for me, rule out any misconfiguration you have which may
slow down your access

from memory, site is geocities.com/yosponge

-- 
Alastair Smeaton


Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP SP2 *will* be delivered ??
    ... > had no problems whatsoever. ... The 10% with problems are generally mild ... >suggestions on the update window to be ready for the download of SP2, ... >> preventing you installing SP2. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Zon Alarm vs/and Windows firewall?
    ... I see no reason why you can not run more than one firewall. ... > John Barnett MVP wrote: ... >> recommend that you disable Windows Firewall prior to installing ZA. ... > experienced any problems whatsoever. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)