Re: Port Forwarding
From: Amy and/or Russell (rmunday_at_)
Date: 09/07/03
- Next message: Warren: "Question on Norton Firewall Subscription Updates"
- Previous message: Vik Mehta: "IE doesn't work if ZoneAlarm isn't running"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Port Forwarding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 14:31:13 GMT
I agree with wholeheartedly with the Linux Gateway/Firewall option. At my
work I built an OpenBSD box with PF, it runs on a P2 300MHz with 128 MB of
RAM. It's been up for 90 days straight, and it has never broke a sweat
connected to a cable modem. This was a very cheap option, as the box was
just lying around doing nothing anyway. There are several sites that can
walk you through it very easily.
http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html
> There are ADSL router/modem combination appliances. I think the bottom
> line is that a Windows anything as a gateway/firewall device is
> questionable, unless it's a *Baston Host* device where the vulnerable
> services on a NT based O/S are stripped from the gateway machine. The
> Windows O/S(s) are too vulnerable to attack. Maybe, a Linux
> gateway/firewall machine or the router in front of the NT based machines
> are viable solutions for good protection.
>
> It's just a suggestion.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;315669
>
> Who is to say that it won't happen?
>
> Duane :)
>
- Next message: Warren: "Question on Norton Firewall Subscription Updates"
- Previous message: Vik Mehta: "IE doesn't work if ZoneAlarm isn't running"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Port Forwarding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]