Re: KPF4is Buggy-What else for Win2k3 Server?
From: \ (dvader_at_deathstar.mil)
Date: 08/31/03
- Next message: chrisclu: "Re: Morbidly obese teen arrested in "Blaster" attack."
- Previous message: Larry: "KPF4is Buggy-What else for Win2k3 Server?"
- In reply to: Larry: "KPF4is Buggy-What else for Win2k3 Server?"
- Next in thread: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: KPF4is Buggy-What else for Win2k3 Server?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 11:50:09 -0400
>Subject says it all. I was waiting for KPF 4.0 for a win2k3 server that I
>use on a home network. Too, too buggy for me. What else works that has a
>fairly small footprint. I'm not into Zone Alarm, just something as nice as
>KPF 2.1.5, which won't run.
As far as I know, KPF 2.1.5 is the last of the small footprint, basic, rule
based firewalls for the home user in existence. I don't know what may be
available in an "enterprise" (read expensive) firewall. KPF 4, even if it
worked, is nothing like KPF 2.1.5.
I've been looking (unsuccessfully) for three years for a suitable replacement
for AtGuard. KPF 2.1.5 is the closest I have come.
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: chrisclu: "Re: Morbidly obese teen arrested in "Blaster" attack."
- Previous message: Larry: "KPF4is Buggy-What else for Win2k3 Server?"
- In reply to: Larry: "KPF4is Buggy-What else for Win2k3 Server?"
- Next in thread: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: KPF4is Buggy-What else for Win2k3 Server?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]