Re: Kerio PF 4.2

From: Alastair Smeaton (smeaton_at_dsl.pipex.com)
Date: 08/30/03 

Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:34:01 +0100

On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 10:00:18 -0400, "\"Crash\" Dummy"
<dvader@deathstar.mil> wrote:

>
>Sorry to hear that. I don't have (or want) XP. I'm still using W2K. For that
>matter, I don't really use Kerio full time. My first choice is still AtGuard,
>but I have a test system with KPF installed, preparing for the day when AtGuard
>no longer works with one update or another. Now with KPF 2.1.5 doomed to
>extinction, I'll have to look for another alternative. :-(

Why is 2.15 doomed ? It works, you can tell it what to do and it will
do it.

Sure it may not be further developed, but surely it will still work ?

Is Atguard free ? Why do you prefer it ? I ask as I use sygate, but
still don't feel that I understand why it works- can't see the rules
so easily 

-- 
Alastair Smeaton