Re: Kerio PF 4.2
From: \ (dvader_at_deathstar.mil)
Date: 08/30/03
- Next message: Lord Shaolin: "Re: Trying to make sense of personal firewalls"
- Previous message: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- In reply to: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- Next in thread: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- Reply: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 10:00:18 -0400
>I wish I could stick with 2.15 - tried it 3 times, over a long period,
>but I am one of the very few XP users for whom it causes a BSOD.
Sorry to hear that. I don't have (or want) XP. I'm still using W2K. For that
matter, I don't really use Kerio full time. My first choice is still AtGuard,
but I have a test system with KPF installed, preparing for the day when AtGuard
no longer works with one update or another. Now with KPF 2.1.5 doomed to
extinction, I'll have to look for another alternative. :-(
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: Lord Shaolin: "Re: Trying to make sense of personal firewalls"
- Previous message: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- In reply to: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- Next in thread: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- Reply: Alastair Smeaton: "Re: Kerio PF 4.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]