Re: IPCop vs Shorewall vs ??

From: nunya (business_at_127.0.0.1)
Date: 08/19/03 

Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:49:50 -0700

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:58:47 -0400, James Lundy wrote:

> Anyone have a recomendation one over the other?
>
>
> I have about 75 PCs on three subnets just using e-mail and a very
> little web.
> I also have two servers that will need VPN to outside service
> providers.
>
> Current Cisco is between intranet and internet and cannot be
> updated to handle VPN ;(.
>
> TIA
>
> jim
Definitely shorewall for absolute control without bloat and overhead.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SBS site to site 2003
    ... "In that case how can I get them to communicate when they are on different ... VPN will take care of this. ... >> to be on different subnets so that traffic can get to the right ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • IPCop vs Shorewall vs ??
    ... Anyone have a recomendation one over the other? ... I have about 75 PCs on three subnets just using e-mail and a very ... I also have two servers that will need VPN to outside service ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers
    ... site to site VPN. ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... | Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Change of IP for Servers
    ... Static device like printers will need to have their gateway's ... All servers ... We have an ISP who is providing internet and VPN access. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: They are coming back from holdays
    ... If they violate company policy then it's unethical, ... there are commercial public VPN services that encourage ... IT admin here try and crack and sniff a 256 bit encryption scheme. ... I did see a lot of connections coming through this company's servers ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)