IPCop vs Shorewall vs ??

From: James Lundy (jlundy2001_at_cox.net)
Date: 08/19/03 

Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:58:47 -0400

Anyone have a recomendation one over the other?

I have about 75 PCs on three subnets just using e-mail and a very
little web.
I also have two servers that will need VPN to outside service
providers.

Current Cisco is between intranet and internet and cannot be
updated to handle VPN ;(.

TIA

jim

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IPCop vs Shorewall vs ??
    ... > I have about 75 PCs on three subnets just using e-mail and a very ... > I also have two servers that will need VPN to outside service ... > updated to handle VPN;(. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: XP PCs suddenly not doing passthrough auth
    ... Cisco VPN hardware. ... may want to research SMB signing in TechNet. ... client policy to disable the client ability to use alternate network ... > Two identical Windows XP Home PCs ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: Simple Home Network Help
    ... Here is what I have done...both PCs have File and Print ... The list of servers for this workgroup ... >>>administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. ... A VPN could certainly be relevant here. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: networking / vpn / dhcp question
    ... I would recommend keeping as much of that independence as best ... Don't make them hopelessly dependent on a VPN link that by nature ... any other router that is between two subnets. ... Connecting to that server is ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: General Question--Sys Admins
    ... It is our policy that only company owned PCs may access the network either ... via VPN or direct connections. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)