Re: Linux firewall on P166
From: James Knott (bit_bucket_at_rogers.com)
Date: 08/15/03
- Next message: Bit Twister: "Re: msblast worm"
- Previous message: svek: "Re: ZA vs Kerio"
- In reply to: /dev/rob0: "Re: Linux firewall on P166"
- Next in thread: James Knott: "Re: Linux firewall on P166"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:28:13 GMT
/dev/rob0 wrote:
> Admin webpages? What's all this? You're talking about running another
> service. A 386 with 8MB can manage bash and iptables fine. Mine also did
> dhcpd and ntpd for all my local machines.
For securtity reasons, it's not a good idea to run anything more than
necessary on a firewall. The more that's running, the greater potential
for security problems.
-- Fundamentalism is fundamentally wrong. To reply to this message, replace everything to the left of "@" with james.knott.
- Next message: Bit Twister: "Re: msblast worm"
- Previous message: svek: "Re: ZA vs Kerio"
- In reply to: /dev/rob0: "Re: Linux firewall on P166"
- Next in thread: James Knott: "Re: Linux firewall on P166"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]