Re: Cisco PIX + VPN + NAT/PAT/Transparent tunnels
From: Pinko_Commie (matt_elk(REMOVE)_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/12/03
- Next message: Richard: "Re: Zonealarm error"
- Previous message: Fred Ma: "How to lose the multicasting"
- In reply to: Pinko_Commie: "Re: Cisco PIX + VPN + NAT/PAT/Transparent tunnels"
- Next in thread: Pinko_Commie: "Re: Cisco PIX + VPN + NAT/PAT/Transparent tunnels"
- Reply: Pinko_Commie: "Re: Cisco PIX + VPN + NAT/PAT/Transparent tunnels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:28:19 +0100
"Pinko_Commie" <matt_elk(REMOVE)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bhaopq$uf5vp$1@ID-110619.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Pinko_Commie" <matt_elk(REMOVE)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bhalht$106qtn$1@ID-110619.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> As an addendum, i have just upgraded the OS to 6.3 and the PDM to 3.1
>
> cheers.
As an extra addendum, upgrading the PIX software actually allowed me to
connect the tunnel, but i cannot seem to ping anything inside the network
(the same VPN connection works fine over POTS dialup).
>
>
- Next message: Richard: "Re: Zonealarm error"
- Previous message: Fred Ma: "How to lose the multicasting"
- In reply to: Pinko_Commie: "Re: Cisco PIX + VPN + NAT/PAT/Transparent tunnels"
- Next in thread: Pinko_Commie: "Re: Cisco PIX + VPN + NAT/PAT/Transparent tunnels"
- Reply: Pinko_Commie: "Re: Cisco PIX + VPN + NAT/PAT/Transparent tunnels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|