Re: Linux Firewall/NAT replacement for Linksys BEFSR41
From: Skylar Thompson (skylar_at_quark.cs.earlham.edu)
Date: 06/22/03
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Where did you go, Duane?"
- Previous message: Rex: "Re: ZoneAlarmPro 4 Vs. ZoneAlarmPro 3"
- In reply to: Wolf: "Linux Firewall/NAT replacement for Linksys BEFSR41"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:23:36 GMT
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 06:12:26 GMT, Wolf <temp7@thewolfden.org> wrote:
> Can a Linux Firewall/NAT solution be used as an easy and compatible
> replacement for an existing BEFSR41? (Just NAT, Firewall, VPN,
> Forwarding support.)
>
> Any caveats?
Personally, I find iptables to be rather hard to configure. I use NetBSD on
a machine for a gateway, and it does firewalling, SNAT, and DNAT. The rules
are much simpler and easier to use, and NetBSD uses less resources to boot.
-- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Where did you go, Duane?"
- Previous message: Rex: "Re: ZoneAlarmPro 4 Vs. ZoneAlarmPro 3"
- In reply to: Wolf: "Linux Firewall/NAT replacement for Linksys BEFSR41"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
