Re: Firewall Necessity?
From: \ (dvader@deathstar.mil)
Date: 03/31/03
- Next message: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Previous message: scan: "Re: IPTables masquerading"
- In reply to: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Next in thread: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Reply: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "\"Crash\" Dummy" <dvader@deathstar.mil> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:38:01 -0500
>You don't have to disable scripting in Moz based browsers. That's the
>point.
You keep changing the subject. Scripting isn't "active content," and you don't
have to disable scripting in IE, either. I don't. Those who do have been
listening to the same misinformation that you have. It is only when scripts are
allowed to use ActiveX controls (a.k.a. active content) that a potential threat
exists. You are welcome to use whatever browser you choose, but don't confuse
your personal prejudice with reality.
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Previous message: scan: "Re: IPTables masquerading"
- In reply to: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Next in thread: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Reply: Art Kopp: "Re: Firewall Necessity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]