Re: Firewall question
From: Wayne McGlinn (wmcglinn@optushome.com.au)
Date: 03/15/03
- Next message: boomvader: "Rapidstream 2000 Alarm LED"
- Previous message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: SmartFirewall.Com"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Firewall question"
- Next in thread: Jesper Skriver: "Re: Firewall question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Wayne McGlinn" <wmcglinn@optushome.com.au> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:18:37 +1000
Ah, ok, so in Sun's implementation, if its too long, then it uses TCP, as
opposed to the STD13 stating to use the TC bit :) Thanks for the references
mate.
Wayne
"Lars M. Hansen" <badnews@hansenonline.net> wrote in message
news:m8f67v89jbhvdd1npnlrfse1g9im4muud9@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:43:36 +1000, Wayne McGlinn spoketh
>
> >References please ?? Not Cisco, but RFC's if possible :) As I quoted
> >previously from STD13:
> >
>
> http://www.linux-mag.com/2002-07/tech_support_01.html
>
> http://networking.earthweb.com/netsecur/article.php/10952_625181_5
>
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/docs/guide/jndi/jndi-dns.html#CONF
>
>
> And, of course RFC 1035:
>
> 4.2 Transport
>
> The Internet supports name server access using TCP [RFC-793] on server
> ^^^
> port 53 (decimal) as well as datagram access using UDP [RFC-768] on UDP
> port 53 (decimal).
>
> Lars M. Hansen
> http://www.hansenonline.net
> (replace 'badnews' with 'news' in e-mail address)
- Next message: boomvader: "Rapidstream 2000 Alarm LED"
- Previous message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: SmartFirewall.Com"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Firewall question"
- Next in thread: Jesper Skriver: "Re: Firewall question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|