Re: SOHO firewall dropping incoming 443 connections - incorrect state
From: Brother from another planet (somethingtellsme@youwanttospamme.com)
Date: 03/11/03
- Next message: Peter: "Am I in any danger by using OLD version of Zone Alarm?"
- Previous message: EB: "Sonicwall SOHO3 configuration"
- In reply to: ITguy_uk: "SOHO firewall dropping incoming 443 connections - incorrect state"
- Next in thread: uweiro: "Re: SOHO firewall dropping incoming 443 connections - incorrect state"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Brother from another planet" <somethingtellsme@youwanttospamme.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:15:50 -0500
That's a tough call on what to pin down on this issue. Have you called
Watchguard tech support? Or have you considered a Netgear router? I use an
FVS318, which I think you can configure for SOHO.
"ITguy_uk" <itguy_uk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8be6df4c.0303110319.199b47ae@posting.google.com...
> I am currently using a Watchguard SOHO firewall (version 5.1.6 boot
> rom 3.7) to connect a private ethernet network to the internet via an
> ADSL line. The only incoming connection that I allow is an HTTPS port
> (443) to an Outlook Web Access server for remote users (mainly on
> dialups). Occasionally the firewall seem to just start denying HTTPS
> connections on port 443.
>
> Most of the time this works correctly and the firewall logs shows
> (IP's changed):
>
> 2003-02-19 18:20:41 Local0.Info 192.168.1.5 IP: Packet allowed from
> x.x.x.x port 1172 to 200.200.200.200 port 443 (TCP)(allow by HTTPS)
>
> However sometimes in the middle of these allowed messages I see:
>
> 2003-02-19 18:20:41 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1170 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:20:46 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1169 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:20:50 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1170 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:20:55 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1169 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:21:06 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1170 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:21:18 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1169 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:21:37 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1170 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:22:01 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1169 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
> 2003-02-19 18:23:27 Local0.Info x.x.x.x IP: Packet allowed from
> x.x.x.x port 1173 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(allow by HTTPS)
> 2003-02-19 18:23:29 Local0.Warning x.x.x.x IP: Packet discarded from
> x.x.x.x port 1173 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(incorrect state)
>
> and then in reverts back to accepting again with the message:
>
> 2003-02-19 18:23:29 Local0.Info 192.168.1.202 IP: Packet allowed from
> x.x.x.x port 1174 to x.x.x.x port 443 (TCP)(allow by HTTPS)
>
> There appears several ways to resolve this:
>
> 1. Reboot the firewall.
>
> 2. External user disconnects from dialup reconnects, I assume this
> resolves it as the user obtains a new IP address from their ISP's DHCP
> server.
>
> 3. Wait and then attempt to reconnect. I assume this allows a timeout
> to take effect.
>
> I have read on the net that the "Incorrect state" messages is due to
> the TCP three way handshake not completing properly and so the
> firewall drops the connection. I also read that one person resolved a
> similar issue (dropping incoming SMTP connections) by downgrading the
> firmware on the box to a previous version but I am reluctant to do
> this because of the security implications. It was also suggested to
> check that this was not a licensing issue i.e. number of users and
> this is not the case.
>
> Has anyone else experienced this and if so have the resolved it? Any
> suggestions, hints or resolutions would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
- Next message: Peter: "Am I in any danger by using OLD version of Zone Alarm?"
- Previous message: EB: "Sonicwall SOHO3 configuration"
- In reply to: ITguy_uk: "SOHO firewall dropping incoming 443 connections - incorrect state"
- Next in thread: uweiro: "Re: SOHO firewall dropping incoming 443 connections - incorrect state"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|