PAT is really secure?
From: Antonio.P (antonio.p@llibero.it)
Date: 03/07/03
- Next message: DougNews: "Re: Zonealarm: which is trusted ?"
- Previous message: Robby McGehee: "WARNING - SonicWall is a joke of a company - stay away"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: PAT is really secure?"
- Reply: John: "Re: PAT is really secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Antonio.P" <antonio.p@llibero.it> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 16:22:29 GMT
Hi to all in group.
I have installed a new flat adsl line with a router configured in PAT (port
address traslation). I have several private IP address in my internal lan
and only an address on the Internet.
I can see the Internet from my lan pcs but nobody can connect to my lan pc
from Internet.
So I don't need a firewall becouse the PAT configuration protect my lan or I
also need a firewall??
Thank you.
- Next message: DougNews: "Re: Zonealarm: which is trusted ?"
- Previous message: Robby McGehee: "WARNING - SonicWall is a joke of a company - stay away"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: PAT is really secure?"
- Reply: John: "Re: PAT is really secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|