Re: I

From: The Other Guy (nospam@this.addy)
Date: 03/01/03 

From: The Other Guy <nospam@this.addy>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 19:36:47 GMT

On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 12:36:15 +0000, while waiting for Somebody Else to
show up and say something, The Other Guy responded to a post from Adie
<a_usenetizen@hotmail.com> who wrote in comp.security.firewalls:

>>
>>Now who is being the paranoid ninny. Plenty of opportunities to tamper
>>with a log file leads to reasonable doubt; potential motive for
>>tampering with logs?, you say.
>
>I merely pointed out that there are potential grounds for reasonable
>doubt, I don't see how that makes me a paranoid ninny -- a pragmatic ninny
>maybe, but paranoid noo.

Oh, I see. You call steve harris "a paranoid ninny" when he points out
there are potential grounds that the OP's actions may have been
already logged, yet you deny being a paranoid ninny yourself, but
describe yourself as a "pragmatic ninny", for pointing out reasonable
doubt in the accuracy of such logs.

Then you have, in my mind, the audacity, let alone the arrogance, to
question whether steve "wipes his bosses (sic) arse, too"

<snip the bull***>

>You seem to be agreeing with me now... Oh well, better late than never.

Don't flatter yourself. In fact, you've missed the point entirely. As
much as you like to believe that you are right and are going to any
lengths to argue your case (or defend your original actions,
whichever), you clearly prove only that you are a second-rate
usenetizen and nothing more.

Seems like you've shown that you are a self-rightious idiot than a
person of any knowledgable substance.

*plonk* 

-- 
./configure --prefix=~/zyterion
Not this guy or that guy, The Other Guy.
This spot may contain a satirical comment or comedic source,
and is meant to be funny. If you are easily offended, gullible
or don't have a sense of humour we suggest you read elsewhere.
Quantcast