Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?
From: Jim Seymour (jseymour@spamcop.net)
Date: 02/27/03
- Next message: Jim Seymour: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Previous message: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Mike: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Mike: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Jim Seymour" <jseymour@spamcop.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:08:25 -0800
Mike wrote:
> Can you specify the remote port in remote desktop? On the firewall,
> (for say 10 users), you could map ports 3389-3399 individually to each
> user's IP address. Each of the ports could have a port rule that's
> restricted to its corresponding remote static IP.
Yes, I can specify the port with a registry hack (3389 is just the default).
So the question becomes which routers support "port rules" (restricting
ports based on the source IP)?
An aside: One of my biggest problems with this research is the lack of
consistent terminology. It seems as though each manufacturer uses different
buzzwords to describe the same technology...
-- Jim Seymour
- Next message: Jim Seymour: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Previous message: Robert Tinsley: "Re: Port Scans and Prelude"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Mike: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Mike: "Re: Port forwarding based on source IP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|