Re: Gateway
From: NeoSadist (neos@dist)
Date: 02/13/03
- Next message: B. Switzer: "Re: Access (telnet?) to pix firewall from outside... which sw?"
- Previous message: NeoSadist: "Re: Stateful Packet Inspection Firewall"
- In reply to: Virust Talk: "Gateway"
- Next in thread: Wolfgang Pawlinetz: "Re: Gateway"
- Reply: Wolfgang Pawlinetz: "Re: Gateway"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "NeoSadist" <neos@dist> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:35:37 -0700
"Virust Talk" <virusguy@virust.com> wrote in message
news:99B2a.244276$sV3.7953224@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> Hi all... I am looking at setting up a Linux gateway for a small LAN of
> about 15 PC's of win 95, 98, ME, XP and 2000. What flavour should I use?
>
> Regards
>
>
Something compatible with micro$oft. By the way, windows 2000 is better in
terms of being able to be configured to lan with things of a different
flavor, and also to be able to share folders and printers wth them.
- Next message: B. Switzer: "Re: Access (telnet?) to pix firewall from outside... which sw?"
- Previous message: NeoSadist: "Re: Stateful Packet Inspection Firewall"
- In reply to: Virust Talk: "Gateway"
- Next in thread: Wolfgang Pawlinetz: "Re: Gateway"
- Reply: Wolfgang Pawlinetz: "Re: Gateway"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
