Re: Stealth vs. Blocked
From: Lars M. Hansen (badnews@hansenonline.net)
Date: 02/01/03
- Next message: Dale C Brodin: "Re: mystery incoming traffic"
- Previous message: Hansang Bae: "Re: cisco PIX 501 Problem"
- In reply to: JR: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Next in thread: Vlad Tsyrklevich: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Reply: Vlad Tsyrklevich: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Reply: bluejay: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Lars M. Hansen <badnews@hansenonline.net> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 03:47:54 GMT
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:12:16 -0500, JR spoketh
>
>"Lars M. Hansen" <badnews@hansenonline.net> wrote in message
>news:5u6m3vgenbm4cldhs7p2vn8ikl68afvosn@4ax.com...
>> Stealth does not improve your security. In fact, it probably creates a
>> false sense of security where people are thinking since they are
>> "stealth", they don't have to worry about all the crap that's out there.
>>
>Other than the false sense of security, do you not think that every
>additional stumbling block for the kiddies helps?
>I tend to look at it as hiding in a cornfield. The corn ain't gonna stop any
>bullets, but the *** with the gun is gonna have to work a lot harder to
>hit you. And yes, a bunker hiding in that cornfield would be nice. :-)
>JR
>
No, since the script kiddies knows that a lot of people are hiding
behind stealth, they probably work around it.
It's more like hiding in a barrel. Although they cannot see what's on
the inside, its often very easy to catch...
Lars M. Hansen
http://www.hansenonline.net
(replace 'badnews' with 'news' in e-mail address)
- Next message: Dale C Brodin: "Re: mystery incoming traffic"
- Previous message: Hansang Bae: "Re: cisco PIX 501 Problem"
- In reply to: JR: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Next in thread: Vlad Tsyrklevich: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Reply: Vlad Tsyrklevich: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Reply: bluejay: "Re: Stealth vs. Blocked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]