Re: Reccomendation for small office needed
From: Router Man (route_man89@hotmail.com)
Date: 01/31/03
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: NT Kernel access"
- Previous message: Jeremiah Kristal: "Re: Opinion on Netscreen 5xp needed"
- In reply to: Mike Forman: "Reccomendation for small office needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Router Man" <route_man89@hotmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 04:25:40 GMT
PIX 501 50 user is under 1k, and it has a 4 port switch in it. Put the WEB
servers behind it or you are asking to get hacked.
Don
"Mike Forman" <ec-online@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:53966355.00015ec5.016@drn.newsguy.com...
> Our ISP provides us with a Quad T1.
>
> 4 machines use static IP's
> about 10 more use DHCP (provided by our ISP)
>
> 2 of the static IP's are webservers, so they will remain outside of the
> firewall. All of the other machines need to be protected. I also need a
few
> VPN connections (under 10).
>
> While I don't need every bell and whistle, I'd like the firewall to have
the
> "standard" set of tools. I say "standard", because I haven't much
experience
> with sophisticated firewalls and don't know what is necessary and what is
not.
>
> Any reccomendations for a "cheap" unit? I'd like to try to keep it under
1K if
> possible. Hope thats not asking too much.
>
> -Mike
>
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: NT Kernel access"
- Previous message: Jeremiah Kristal: "Re: Opinion on Netscreen 5xp needed"
- In reply to: Mike Forman: "Reccomendation for small office needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|