Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5
From: \ (dvader@deathstar.mil)
Date: 01/24/03
- Next message: KC2KSZ: "Re: Zone Alarm Pro 3.5"
- Previous message: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: Opinion on Netscreen 5xp needed"
- In reply to: Lance Delacroix: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Next in thread: Lance Delacroix: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Reply: Lance Delacroix: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Reply: The Reverant Dumb: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Reply: The Reverant Dumb: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "\"Crash\" Dummy" <dvader@deathstar.mil> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:00:36 -0500
>What's wrong with 2.1.4? Seems fine to me.
Nothing. That's my point. I'd rather they stick with keeping it up to date than
changing to a big and bloated, "feature rich" firewall, which is what 3.x is.
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy Certified Dilettante crash@gpick.com http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: KC2KSZ: "Re: Zone Alarm Pro 3.5"
- Previous message: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: Opinion on Netscreen 5xp needed"
- In reply to: Lance Delacroix: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Next in thread: Lance Delacroix: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Reply: Lance Delacroix: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Reply: The Reverant Dumb: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Reply: The Reverant Dumb: "Re: Kerio scraps KPF 3.0, working on KPF 3.5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading