Re: Complex Case
From: Coolcat (muzor1@data-company.nl)
Date: 01/13/03
- Next message: Tim Haynes: "Re: WLAN 802.11b Security FAQ"
- Previous message: JR: "Misconceptions"
- In reply to: Coolcat: "Complex Case"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Coolcat" <muzor1@data-company.nl> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:46:03 +0100
Hi Guys,
Thank you for your comment I just was looking for way to serve the same port
on 2 machines because I didnt wanted to invest more money into this
archtecture. I will look what is more feasable to use change the port or
have an additional IP number where I will forward the traffic from port 80
to the other machine.
THX
Rudy
"Coolcat" <muzor1@data-company.nl> wrote in message
news:3e22af81$0$806$4d4ebb8e@news.nl.uu.net...
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 servers named A and B.
> A=192.168.0.10
> B=192.168.0.20
> and a firewall named X. its ip=192.168.0.1 and public =207.46.249.27
> On machine A I have a chatserver running on port 80.
> On machine B I have a webserver running on port 80.
>
> Question :
> Which firewall (linux,unix) can help me in this case to do the following :
> 1. forward request for hostname : my.chatserver.com=207.46.249.27 to
server
> A on port 80
> 2. Forward request for HTTP host header :
> webserver.chatserver.com=207.46.249.27 to server B on port 80
>
> Waiting for your reply.
>
> Regards,
> WizarD
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Tim Haynes: "Re: WLAN 802.11b Security FAQ"
- Previous message: JR: "Misconceptions"
- In reply to: Coolcat: "Complex Case"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
