Re: Neither, buy a router.
From: Leythos (void@nowhere.com)
Date: 01/02/03
- Next message: Anson Chuang: "Netgear FVS318 VPN"
- Previous message: Coercitas Temet'Nosce: "Re: [Firewalls] Re: Neither, buy a router."
- In reply to: David: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Next in thread: Bob: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Reply: Bob: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Reply: David: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Leythos <void@nowhere.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:55:12 GMT
In article <xHNQ9.42010$VA5.8519246@news1.news.adelphia.net>,
davidwnh@adelphia.net says...
[snip]
> There is a good reason why some of the router manufacturers are bundling
> personal firewalls with their routers, and it is not just a marketing ploy.
> And there is a good reason why the same manufacturers are also now making
> routers with more extensive filtering and access control. And I thank
> Moore's Law for giving me a CPU in which I can run several services and game
> at the same time.
I agree with you, and it appears that we agree: Having at least the
hardware router/NAT with a software firewall IS a good idea. I don't
have a problem with software firewalls (I use CheckPoint FW-1 on one of
my networks, Firebox II on another, and just a router/NAT on another),
but I think that people that use ONLY a "personal" software firewall on
the same system that they work from are loosing a lot of horsepower.
Even linksys bundles personal firewall software with their router.
Having the router saves on how slow the typical home users computer will
get on a random basis.
So, I agree: Get a personal firewall, but also get a router to act as
the first line of defense.
I still think that the majority of home users will misconfigure their
personal firewall, or let something out because they don't know what it
is :)
BTW: My router logs get sent to a SQL server, then parsed to a web page,
and entry points/attempts are shown in select colors based on the port
number/range. I read my logs every day, just like at work.
Mark
> > This is in reference to PERSONAL FIREWALL APPS, not Checkpoint or
> > something like that:
> > 1) Software firewalls utilize CPU cycles on the machine they run on.
> > 2) Software firewalls are easy to misconfigure and are often
> > misconfigured.
> > 3) Software firewalls can cause problems with applications on the system
> > 4) Once you are under attack, a real one, not just a probe, your machine
> > utilizes almost 100% CPU cycles to fend it off.
> >
> > This is in reference to Modem Routers (Linksys, DLink, etc...)
> > A) Routers with NAT don't use ANY CPU cycles on the computers
> > B) Routers with NAT are easy to properly configure, then forget
> > C) Routers with NAT can cause problems with internet sharing apps (like
> > ICQ, Games) but in general they don't.
> > D) Routers with NAT protect more than one computer.
> >
> > You can, and should for a while, install the Router with NAT and a
> > personal firewall application - once you see that you don't really need
> > the personal firewall you can remove it.
> >
> > IN ALL EXAMPLES YOU SHOULD MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE STRONG ANTI-VIRUS
> > SOFTWARE INSTALLED.
> >
> > If you are going to run a software Proxy or NAT, just get a hardware one
> > for $75 bucks and be happy - no parts, no software, not hassle.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Leythos999@columbus.rr.com
> > (Remove 999 to reply to me)
>
>
>
-- -- Leythos999@columbus.rr.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Anson Chuang: "Netgear FVS318 VPN"
- Previous message: Coercitas Temet'Nosce: "Re: [Firewalls] Re: Neither, buy a router."
- In reply to: David: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Next in thread: Bob: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Reply: Bob: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Reply: David: "Re: Neither, buy a router."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|