Re: Smoothwall
From: taharka (taharka@HotPOP.com)
Date: 12/10/02
- Next message: SysAdm: "Re: clipboard insecure?"
- Previous message: SysAdm: "Re: sygate firewall pro , guru ?????"
- In reply to: Cxyber: "Smoothwall"
- Next in thread: Jason: "Re: Smoothwall"
- Reply: Jason: "Re: Smoothwall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "taharka" <taharka@HotPOP.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:17:54 GMT
"Cxyber" <Cxyber@hatesSpam.here> wrote in message
news:Xns92E0A48E8357ECxyberhatesSpamhere@210.49.20.254...
> Thankx Folks,,
> I shall go try IPCop..
> Any comments on how secure this might be..
> Also what about blocking out-going packets.?
IMHO, Smoothwall 2.0 bullet is the superior product. Newer kernel & IPTABLES
vs. IPCHAINS in IPcop. Besides, why settle for a fork of Smoothwall when you
can have the real deal at the same price?
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 12/6/2002
- Next message: SysAdm: "Re: clipboard insecure?"
- Previous message: SysAdm: "Re: sygate firewall pro , guru ?????"
- In reply to: Cxyber: "Smoothwall"
- Next in thread: Jason: "Re: Smoothwall"
- Reply: Jason: "Re: Smoothwall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|