Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003
From: NeoSadist (neos@dist)
Date: 12/09/02
- Next message: SysAdm: "Re: NetBios attack question"
- Previous message: NeoSadist: "Re: firewall recommendation !"
- In reply to: David: "Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003"
- Next in thread: David: "Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003"
- Reply: David: "Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "NeoSadist" <neos@dist> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:00:08 -0700
"David" <davidwnh@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:PUZI9.4569$VA5.738611@news1.news.adelphia.net...
> Keep in mind that uninstalling more often than not does not clean up after
> itself. A lot of registry entries and often settings/configuration files
and
> databases are left behind so that settings are not lost if someone is
> reinstalling due to other problems or for upgrades.
>
> > I upgraded to NPF2003/NAV2003 and everything was wrong again ( i didn't
> > upgrade, but uninstalled the prog's and installed the new ones.) No port
>
> As these posts go on you are including new information. You are now saying
> server. I should have picked that up when you mentioned running so many
> services. Are you running Win2K server? Over time I have seen Symantec's
> workstation products become less and less compatible with Server OS's.
This
> may be the whole problem. I have seen one other poster here and a couple
> elsewhere who were having problems getting their rules to work in NPF2003
on
> a server. Maybe incompatibility with your OS is the problem? Although much
> of the underlying code is the same there are some crutial differences
> between server and workstation os's that could severely hinder a firewall
> that isn't designed and tested with a server OS. I wouldn't doubt that
this
> is your rules problem.
> > I have a ghost of the server with NPF2002/NAV2002 and i applied the
image
> > and rebooted. And NPF2002 would detect any scans and allow the
p2p-traffic
>
>
>
>
True. I mean, win2k pro is a lot better at not leaving krap on the system
after uninstall, but on win95/98/me it's not that good, you're right.
That's why I also have norton utilities lol. Cleans up after lots of
things. I actually was running the same installation of win98se for like 2
years!
- Next message: SysAdm: "Re: NetBios attack question"
- Previous message: NeoSadist: "Re: firewall recommendation !"
- In reply to: David: "Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003"
- Next in thread: David: "Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003"
- Reply: David: "Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|