Re: Netscreen, Sonicwalls or Watchguard - VPN clients - Which doesn't suck
From: NetEng (cclark@trailersaver.com)
Date: 11/29/02
- Next message: NeoSadist: "Re: Kazaa Block !"
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Zone Alarm Pro 3.5?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) john: "Netscreen, Sonicwalls or Watchguard - VPN clients - Which doesn't suck"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "NetEng" <cclark@trailersaver.com> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:22:13 -0600
Netscreen is horrible. I got so frustrated I bought a Cisco and its been
bulletproof. The Netscreen is weak in their VPNconfig as well and the
support is horrible.
"john" <jpohn@amd.net> wrote in message
news:2jk8uuoelflokh14m4eqr7m4eele969g3k@4ax.com...
> hi all-
>
> we deploy ALOT of Sonicwalls and generally we've had great luck as we
> do mostly box 2 box VPN which work like a charm.
>
> Lately, we had 4 clients who wanted the cheaper route and went with
> the clients which just SUCK in my opinion.
>
> Moving forward, hopefully Sonicwall will change the VPN client but for
> now it doesn't appear so.
>
>
> Anyone use the Watchguard or NetScreen line with their VPN clients.
> From the screenshots I'm seeing on the web, it seems hands down 10X as
> better as Sonicwalls. My concern is functionality also.
>
> Please post feedback if you are familair with these products.
>
> thanks
- Next message: NeoSadist: "Re: Kazaa Block !"
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Zone Alarm Pro 3.5?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) john: "Netscreen, Sonicwalls or Watchguard - VPN clients - Which doesn't suck"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
