Re: 53 udp/tcp
From: David (davidwnh@adelphia.net)
Date: 11/28/02
- Next message: hazard: "Kazaa Block !"
- Previous message: David: "Re: netbios"
- In reply to: Doug Fox: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Reply:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "David" <davidwnh@adelphia.net> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:02:37 GMT
Since anything is possible I guess it comes down to weighing the risks.
Compare the vulnerabilities of running your own additional service with
those present by doing things the way you are doing them.
> >
> > I've once even read about an obscure way to tunnel IP traffic by
> > encoding it into hostnames and doing a DNS request on those names (for
> > example: 872782362474454272454648246429.foo.com), which would rely on
> > having somebody on the outside with control over the DNS server that
> > controls foo.com. The server would receive the request and decode the
> > data which is embeded into the weird hostname.
> >
> > I've never seen anybody actually USE this method, though :-)
> >
> > --
> > Juergen Nieveler
> > Support the ban of Dihydrogen Monoxide: http://www.dhmo.org/
> > "The people united can never be ignited!"-Sgt. Colon,Ankh-Morpork Watch
> > http://bofh.gmxhome.de / juergen.nieveler@web.de / PGP Supported!
>
>
- Next message: hazard: "Kazaa Block !"
- Previous message: David: "Re: netbios"
- In reply to: Doug Fox: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Reply:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|