Re: 53 udp/tcp
From: Doug Fox (dfox168@hotmail.com)
Date: 11/28/02
- Next message: Cap: "Re: A Royal Name"
- Previous message: Jay Blackwood: "Re: Configuring a Linksys router/firewall for use with FTP"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Reply:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Doug Fox" <dfox168@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:00:14 -0500
Juergen;
The rule (FW-1) allows out-bound (out-going) traffic. Could "external"
intruders tunnel their traffic through that port? How is it achieved?
Many thanks again.
"Juergen Nieveler" <juergen.nieveler.nospam@arcor.de> wrote in message
news:Xns92D4961CFC8F2juergennieveler@nieveler-43544.user.cis.dfn.de...
> "Doug Fox" <dfox168@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What could be the possible of exposure/risks having port 53 udp/tcp
> > opened for out-bound traffic.
>
> Somebody could tunnel his traffic through DNS requests...
>
> --
> Juergen Nieveler
> Support the ban of Dihydrogen Monoxide: http://www.dhmo.org/
> "The people united can never be ignited!"-Sgt. Colon,Ankh-Morpork Watch
> http://bofh.gmxhome.de / juergen.nieveler@web.de / PGP Supported!
- Next message: Cap: "Re: A Royal Name"
- Previous message: Jay Blackwood: "Re: Configuring a Linksys router/firewall for use with FTP"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Next in thread: Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Reply:(deleted message) Juergen Nieveler: "Re: 53 udp/tcp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]