Re: WatchGuard SOHO vs. Snapgear LITE+
From: df (df@no_spam_me.co)Date: 11/15/02
- Next message: Roland Burr: "Re: Router config for Passive FTP"
- Previous message: TheStef: "Re: RTCW game server behind DSL router NAT/private IP question"
- In reply to: Nathan: "WatchGuard SOHO vs. Snapgear LITE+"
- Next in thread: Ric Griffy: "Re: WatchGuard SOHO vs. Snapgear LITE+"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: df <df@no_spam_me.co> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:59:11 GMT
"Nathan" <nope@not.net> allegedly wrote in
news:9gWA9.161$n81.12680@eagle.america.net:
[snip]
I have only used the Netgear FVS318 on my home systems with no proxies
or servers established. Very simple browser interface. After
installation I dumped the software firewall, but maintain the virus
scanner, spyware detection and popup stopper. I have three systems
with different operating systems all playing together very nicely.
- Next message: Roland Burr: "Re: Router config for Passive FTP"
- Previous message: TheStef: "Re: RTCW game server behind DSL router NAT/private IP question"
- In reply to: Nathan: "WatchGuard SOHO vs. Snapgear LITE+"
- Next in thread: Ric Griffy: "Re: WatchGuard SOHO vs. Snapgear LITE+"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|