Re: NIS 2003 OK now!
From:Date: 11/11/02
- Next message: cbielich: "VPN through IPTABLES impossible?"
- Previous message: : "Re: ZoneAlarm amnesia"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: NIS 2003 OK now!"
- Next in thread: Michael Roper: "Re: NIS 2003 OK now!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:17:09 -0600
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 21:12:20 -0700, "NeoSadist" <neos@dist> wrote:
>
>"Ed" <not@work.com> wrote in message
>news:0k0usuccafdsnfa88cappii41bl1m1tded@4ax.com...
>> For anyone that has seen my posts about NIS 2003 not working in WinXP
>> Pro using the built in PPPOE I finally got it to work by installing and
>> using RASPPPOE instead. Intrusions are now detected instantly and
>> blocked for 30 minutes, all unused ports are stealth,etc,,Yahoo! :-)
>>
>> I didn't want to install 3rd party drivers but it seems this is the only
>> way I can get NIS 2003 to work.
>>
>> Now IOW why NIS 2003 doesn't work correctly using the built in PPPOE in
>> WinXP Pro on both of my WinXP Pro PCs, is it a MS bug or NIS bug? Let
>> the voting start now!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ed
>
>
>Probably an MS bug that symantec didn't know about, or something. If it's a
>home edition of any operating system, in my opinion, it sucks right out of
>the box, but that's just me. Anyways, it's probably a combination of the
>two.
>
My friend has the same setup as me, DSL > NIC on WinXP Pro PPPOE and NIS
2003 works just fine, the only real difference is his board uses the AMD
chipset and both of mine have VIA chipsets, you think maybe the VIA
chipset could .....
Ed
- Next message: cbielich: "VPN through IPTABLES impossible?"
- Previous message: : "Re: ZoneAlarm amnesia"
- In reply to: NeoSadist: "Re: NIS 2003 OK now!"
- Next in thread: Michael Roper: "Re: NIS 2003 OK now!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
