Re: ZoneAlarm backdoor / GRC.com?
From: C.S Hithe (just@chickensh1t.com)Date: 09/23/02
- Next message: : "Re: Setting up a public game server on a LAN - Sonicwall"
- Previous message: Whoever: "Re: NAT Secure?"
- In reply to: Maxx Pollare: "Re: ZoneAlarm backdoor / GRC.com?"
- Next in thread: Ident: "Re: ZoneAlarm backdoor / GRC.com?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: C.S Hithe <just@chickensh1t.com> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:19:49 +0000 (UTC)
On 23 Sep 2002 03:30:20 GMT, Maxx Pollare <spamail@dragonfur.ca> wrote:
>"C.S Hithe" wrote
<SNIP>
>> Some months later, an exploit was discovered for ZoneAlarm where the
>> hacker could identify all open ports on a system with ZoneAlarm
>> installed, by pinging a certain port.
Maxx Pollare <spamail@dragonfur.ca> wrote:
>As for the scan of all ports of a host at once, that tech is
>NanoProbes (http://grc.com/np/np.htm), it's what he uses in his new
>and much faster Shields-Up scanner. This technology will never be
>sold or distributed.
<SNIP>
So doesn't that suggest some form of complicity then, between those two?
If 'NanoProbes' was around before, and the statements are "i've recently found a way to scan all
open ports at once", and "i recommend Zonealarm", doesn't it suggest complicity, and an accidental,
boastful slip re: the new hacking skills?
Im sure ZA has fixed it in more recent versions. I wouldnt actually know.
again, im just here for the free flow of information. i have no vendetta or bias.
- Next message: : "Re: Setting up a public game server on a LAN - Sonicwall"
- Previous message: Whoever: "Re: NAT Secure?"
- In reply to: Maxx Pollare: "Re: ZoneAlarm backdoor / GRC.com?"
- Next in thread: Ident: "Re: ZoneAlarm backdoor / GRC.com?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|