Re: Firewall advice
From:Date: 08/26/02
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Recommendations for firewall packages..."
- Previous message: osama bin kenobi: "(no subject)"
- In reply to: : "Firewall advice"
- Next in thread: glassgnost: "Re: Firewall advice"
- Reply: glassgnost: "Re: Firewall advice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 20:19:25 -0600
"Four Star Computers" <4sc@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d68bfca$0$29910$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi All,
>
> I have a customer who needs to have a server available on the internet for
> three remote users to access.
>
> I would like to set up VPN for three concurrent users maximum, users are
> accessing a terminal service server on the LAN.
>
> Currently the server is directly connected with RRAS (win2k) running, GRC
> shows most ports closed and RPC open.
>
> How Do I change this to stealth, with RPC stealthed as well.
>
> I was thinking of setting up an Unix based box to act as firewall/VPN
access
> point to also restrict/filter outgoing from the LAN
>
> I want to run minimum hardware and software, at lowest possible cost /
> maximum strength.
>
> what do the Guru's Out there suggest I use?
>
> Internet access is via 56K dialup.
>
>
> --
> Michael Warner
> Four Star Computing Services
> Direct Email: 4 star computers @ optusnet . com .au ***remove the
> spaces****
>
>
Does it HAVE to be secure? First of all, it sorta sounds pathetic to ask
for max security plus 3 computers to share a 56K. Try to explain this to
them.
But if they MUST have it that way, why not, instead of vpn or secure vpn,
why not go with external LAN modem into linksys router (since they come with
a NAT firewall and stateful packet inspection)? They could even go with
broadband at a cheaper cost than to run vpn or secure vpn. Besides, no
offense, 56K isn't enough bandwidth to share over 3 computers. With today's
impatient society, it's not enough for even one computer hardly! lol
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Recommendations for firewall packages..."
- Previous message: osama bin kenobi: "(no subject)"
- In reply to: : "Firewall advice"
- Next in thread: glassgnost: "Re: Firewall advice"
- Reply: glassgnost: "Re: Firewall advice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|