Re: Question

From: Melinda Shore (shore@panix.com)
Date: 08/23/02 

From: shore@panix.com (Melinda Shore)
Date: 22 Aug 2002 18:53:31 -0400

In article <slrnamaqke.9qr.eirik@kain.mi.uib.no>,
Eirik Seim <eirik@mi.uib.no> wrote:
>Figured I'd write up an answer, as NAT isnt mentioned in the FAQ, but
>there is also a lot of documentation to find on google:

A good place to start is RFC 2663. Note that NAT behavior
has not been standardized by the IETF (or anybody else) and
that there's tremendous variation among what different NATs
do. 

-- 
     Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - shore@panix.com
          If you send me harassing email, I'll probably post it

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Establishing a site-to-site ipsec connection
    ... Natting is OK if it is done on the same box as the Tunnell server not ... Our Natting implementation is rather simple due to our needs. ... So we nat those ... But even the FreeSWAN documentation appears to have conflicting ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Establishing a site-to-site ipsec connection
    ... >>third parties that IPTABles NATing is a life saver for obuscating ... > what I read says using NAT breaks ipsec connections, ... But even the FreeSWAN documentation appears to have conflicting ... A guide to FreeSwan that acknowledged the existence of NAT'ing ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: NAT problem
    ... to any documentation regarding this? ...  It's mentioned in the Usage Guidelines for the ip nat inside... ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: DFL-800 Port Mapping
    ... Anders Eriksson wrote: ... figure out how to do Port Mappings on it. ... Chapter 7 of the documentation describes NAT and SAT. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Question
    ... >>there is also a lot of documentation to find on google: ... Note that NAT behavior ... This should probably go into the FAQ at ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)